A constitutional battle in New Jersey has exposed a chilling debate over who truly owns the code of life once the state takes a newborn’s blood. Parents are suing the state for collecting, storing, and allegedly sharing baby DNA without consent, calling it a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The lawsuit claims the state “pierces newborns’ skin to seize their blood” and keeps it for decades, even giving samples to law enforcement and researchers without a warrant. While officials recently shortened the storage period, parents argue that the change lacks one critical safeguard—consent. “Our children’s DNA is not government property,” the plaintiffs say, warning that the issue is far larger than testing—it’s about genetic privacy and bodily autonomy.

This case underscores the growing danger of a world where identity is reduced to data. Every drop of blood carries a person’s entire biological blueprint—an unchangeable mark that, once shared, can never be retrieved. In the age of artificial intelligence, that data can be analyzed, profiled, and used for control. What begins as a health measure could become the foundation of a digital system that tracks, predicts, and categorizes humanity itself—a chilling step toward the surveillance infrastructure prophesied in Revelation 13. This is more than a privacy issue; it’s a warning that the age of biological ownership is here.

SOURCE: Reclaim the Net